I have heard Alan Kidd has resigned, so we have a meeting with 2 of potentially 3 commissioners. If there is a dispute as to the accuracy of the minutes what is the legally correct procedure. I am aware that if Alan Kidd decides not to sign the minutes as being a true record of the meeting, and we have rumours about a Philospohy of Historic Racing that has laid dormant but could jump up and bite us how are we riders protected from over zealous MA staff and a commissioiner nobody knows but certainly looks and feels like a lapdog, from pretending the minutes are accurate and presenting us with something that nobody wants.
The Philosopher, the Antagonist take your pick. He who dares to speak!
Former Member
deleted
15 Posts
Posted - 01 Jun 2005 : 11:28:31 AM
To "2stroke",
To set the record strait; I have not, and will not, be signing off on the recent HRR Commission Minutes that were presented to me as being a true and accurate record of the meeting, though if asked I would sign off on an accurate record of the meeting. That said I am not aware of a dispute over the matter as my only connection with MA is that of a competitor. The MA board may simply decide to adopt the Minutes they have anyway, I don't know you'd have to ask them.
Topic Locked
| Join the Forum to Rate this Topic at: 
Posted - 01 Jun 2005 : 07:16:19 AM
